ContactISSN:e-ISSN: 2980-0064
Author Sign-inReviewer Sign-inRegister
TürkçeEnglish
HomeAim and ScopeABOUTGUIDE FOR AUTHORSSend ArticleLatest IssueArchiveContact Us

Satellites and SWOT Analysis of Türkiye's Satellite Studies

Ozan Öztürk

  • Ozan Öztürk: Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
  •  Year : 2024
  •  Vol : 3
  •  Issue : 2
  •  Page : 97-112
Satellites have had a major impact on the world since the mid-20th century. The launch of the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, by the Soviet Union in 1957 marked the beginning of the space age for humanity. This development paved the way for satellite technologies to be used in a wide range of applications, from communications and military applications to environmental monitoring and scientific research. Today, satellites play a critical role in many strategic areas, from national security to economic development. In this era of increasing global competition, leadership in satellite technologies offers an important opportunity for countries to strengthen their position in the international arena. In this context, Turkey is attracting attention with its investments in satellite technologies and is on its way to becoming a regional power. This article comprehensively examines Turkey's satellite efforts from the perspective of SWOT analysis. Turkey has gained many economic, scientific and strategic advantages with its investments in space technologies and developments in this field. Satellite technologies have strengthened the country's global position in many areas such as communication, environmental monitoring and military applications. Turkey's achievements have been especially thanks to the satellites developed within the framework of its indigenous production and national space program. The Göktürk and TÜRKSAT projects have been important steps in demonstrating Turkey's capacity to develop independent satellites. However, there are also some weaknesses that Turkey faces in its satellite efforts. Limited investments in R&D activities, foreign dependence on critical technologies and lack of qualified human resources are the main factors that make the sustainability of satellite projects difficult. This may limit Turkey's competitiveness in an environment where satellite technologies are rapidly developing. On the other hand, international cooperation and indigenous satellite projects offer great opportunities for Turkey. In particular, the potential to gain a greater foothold in the global satellite market could help Turkey realize economic and strategic gains. However, to capitalize on these opportunities, the threats posed by global competition and economic uncertainties need to be carefully managed. In conclusion, this SWOT analysis assesses the current state of Turkey's satellite activities and provides a strategic guide for future steps.
Cite this Article As : Öztürk, O. (2024). Uydular ve Türkiye’nin uydu çalışmalarının SWOT analizi. Aerospace Research Letters (ASREL), 3(2), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.56753/ASREL.2024.2.1

Conflict of interest : The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article is published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Asrel Aerospace Research Letters
2024, Vol3, Issue2
E-ISSN: 2980-0064
Received : , Accepted : , Published Online :

References

  1. Agarwal, R., & Mittal, S. K. (2023). Atmospheric Sciences: An Introductory Survey. Springer.
  2. Ajmera, P. (2017). Integration of SWOT Analysis with Analytic Hierarchy Process for Strategic Decision Making. Decision Science Letters, 6(4), 351-362.
  3. Arthur, M., et al. (2012). Active Satellites in Orbit. International Journal of Satellite Communications, 30(4), 123-130.
  4. Beysens, D., & van Loon, J. J. W. A. (2022). Generation and Applications of Extra-Terrestrial Environments on Earth. CRC Press.
  5. Buzulukova, N., & Tsurutani, B. (2022). Extreme Events in Geospace. Elsevier.
  6. Çal, Ş. (2021). Uzay Çöpleri ve Alınması Gereken Önlemler. Uzay Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(2), 45-53.
  7. Demirtaş, İ. (2002). Uzay Fiziği. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  8. Dinçer, Ö. (2004). Stratejik Yönetim ve İşletme Politikası. Beta Yayınları.
  9. Dyson, R. G. (2004). Strategic Development and SWOT Analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 631-640.
  10. Facsko, G., et al. (2023). Space Weather Effects on Modern Technology. Journal of Space Weather, 11(1), 99-112.
  11. Geçgin, T. (2007). Uzay Radyasyonunun Etkileri ve Korunma Yöntemleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  12. Hemond, H. F., & Fechner, E. J. (2023). Chemical Fate and Transport in the Environment. Academic Press.
  13. Hill, T., & Westbrook, R. (1997). SWOT Analysis: It's Time for a Product Recall. Long Range Planning, 30(1), 46-52.
  14. José, R., et al. (2021). Advancements in Satellite Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 22, 100479.
  15. Kanbur, E., & Karakavuz, A. (2017). Stratejik Yönetim Sürecinde İç ve Dış Çevre Analizi. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 4(10), 1405-1418.
  16. Kangas, J., Pesonen, M., Kurttila, M., & Kajanus, M. (2003). A'WOT: Integrating the AHP with SWOT Analysis. Proceedings of ISAHP, 189-198.
  17. Köksal, S. (2021). Güneş Fırtınalarının Etkileri. Astronomi ve Uzay Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(1), 23-30.
  18. Kumar, P., et al. (2023). Dynamics of the Earth's Atmosphere. Springer.
  19. Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in SWOT Analysis—a Hybrid Method and Its Application to a Forest-Certification Case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52.
  20. Linjie, S., et al. (2018). Global Trends in Satellite Launches. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 55(3), 1-10.
  21. Maini, A. K., & Agrawal, V. (2011). Satellite Technology: Principles and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  22. Moldwin, M. (2022). An Introduction to Space Weather. Cambridge University Press.
  23. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1995). NASA Safety Standard: Guidelines and Assessment Procedures for Limiting Orbital Debris (NSS 1740.14). Office of Safety and Mission Assurance.
  24. Nedim, S., Sözbir, M., Bulut, M., Gülgönül, Ş., Kuzu, L., & Dur, O. (2023). Space activities and the simultaneous development of the economy in Türkiye. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1226156
  25. Özyıldırım, A. (2023). Space from perspective of national security. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.17134/khosbd.1210635
  26. Poh, G. K., et al. (2023). Space Weather Monitoring and Forecasting. Advances in Space Research, 71(2), 456-468.
  27. Raphael, M., et al. (2022). Radiation Shielding in Space Missions. Acta Astronautica, 190, 362-375.
  28. Reichardt, J., & Timm, S. (2020). Atmospheric Composition and Dynamics. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(5), 2679-2694.
  29. Samundi, M. A. (2022). Layers of the Earth's Atmosphere. Oxford University Press.
  30. Samundi, M. A., et al. (2022). Exosphere Characteristics and Satellite Dynamics. Space Science Reviews, 218(3), 1-15.
  31. Sandeep, V., Chauhan, A., & Aasma, S. (2015). A comparative study of satellite orbits: Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO). SAMRIDDHI: A Journal of Physical Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.18090/SAMRIDDHI.V6I2.1559
  32. Serene, S., & Sreeja, S. (2022). Satellite Missions and Applications. Space Science Reviews, 218(2), 1-17.
  33. Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic Management in an Enacted World. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724-736.
  34. Ülgen, H., & Mirze, S. K. (2013). İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim. Beta Yayınları.
  35. van Wijngaarden, W. A., & Happer, W. (2023). Thermospheric Physics and Aurora Phenomena. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 238, 105974.
  36. Waldemar, R., et al. (2023). Space Environment Challenges for Satellite Operations. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 59(3), 2100-2112.
  37. Wang, J., et al. (2023). Impact of Space Weather on Flight Delays. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 109, 103377.
  38. Yermolaev, Y. I., et al. (2023). Solar Activity and Solar Wind Parameters During the Last Four Solar Cycles. Solar Physics, 298(4), 1-17.
  39. Yüksel, İ., & Dağdeviren, M. (2007). Using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) in a SWOT Analysis—A Case Study for a Textile Firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382.
  40. Zheng, Y., et al. (2019). Space Radiation and Astronaut Protection. NASA Technical Reports.