muhammed uçar,Nebi Özdöner

  • muhammed uçar: NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ
  • Nebi Özdöner: Necmettin Erbakan UNİVERSİTESİ
  •  Year : 2025
  •  Vol : 4
  •  Issue : 2
  •  Page : 252-266
This study presents the dynamic analysis of the NREL/MIT tension leg platform (TLP) supporting the NREL 5-MW wind turbine using OpenFAST. The simulations represent environmental conditions specific to the Kıyıköy region in the western Black Sea. Selected Design Load Cases (DLCs) cover both response characterization and extreme sea states defined by IEC guidelines. The platform hydrodynamics are modeled using first-order potential-flow theory to capture primary motions and tendon tensions efficiently. Viscous and second-order effects are excluded to emphasize computational performance. Simulation durations are selected to allow consistent comparison. A computational cost assessment is also conducted. Results show that OpenFAST produces stable and realistic platform responses across all conditions while maintaining low computational demand. The study confirms the capability of time-efficient modeling for preliminary assessments of floating wind turbines in regional environments such as Kıyıköy.
Cite this Article As : Ucar, M., & Ozdoner, N. (2025). Dynamic analysis of the NREL/MIT tension leg platform in OpenFAST. Aerospace Research Letters (ASREL), 4(2), 252-266.

Conflict of interest : The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

This article is published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Asrel Aerospace Research Letters
2025, Vol4, Issue2
E-ISSN: 2980-0064
Received : , Accepted : , Published Online :

References

  1. Buyukzeren, R., Kaya, M. N., Bacakoglu, A. A., Ucar, M., Altıntas, H. B., Ozturk, A., & Bilici, A. Y. (2024). Yatay Eksenli Rüzgâr Türbinlerinde Kule Yüksekliği ve Türbülans Yoğunluğu Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.47112/neufmbd.2024.66
  2. Caceoglu, E., Yildiz, H. K., Oguz, E., Huvaj, N., & Guerrero, J. M. (2022). Offshore wind power plant site selection using Analytical Hierarchy Process for Northwest Turkey. Ocean Engineering, 252, 111178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111178
  3. DNV GL. (2018). DNVGL-ST-0119: Floating Wind Turbine Structures. https://rules.dnv.com/docs/pdf/DNV/ST/2018-07/DNVGL-ST-0119.pdf
  4. Hasselmann, K., Barnett, T. P., Bouws, E., Carlson, H., Cartwright, D. E., Enke, K., Ewing, J. A., Gienapp, A., Hasselmann, D. E., Kruseman, P., & others. (1973). Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (JONSWAP). Ergaenzungsheft Zur Deutschen Hydrographischen Zeitschrift, Reihe A.
  5. Hmedi, M., Uzunoglu, E., Medina-Manuel, A., Mas-Soler, J., Vittori, F., Pires, O., Azcona, J., Souto-Iglesias, A., & Guedes Soares, C. (2022). Experimental Analysis of CENTEC-TLP Self-Stable Platform with a 10 MW Turbine. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(12), 1910. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121910
  6. IEC. (2014). IEC 61400-3-2:Design requirements for floating offshore wind turbines. Wind Energy Generation System—Part, 2–3.
  7. Ismayilli, A., & Buker, M. S. (2024). İHA larda İtki İçin Kullanılan Mikro Turbojet Motorun Hava Kompresörünün Termodinamik Analizi. ASREL. https://doi.org/10.56753/ASREL.2024.3.3
  8. Jonkman, J., Butterfield, S., Musial, W., & Scott, G. (2009). Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development.
  9. Kaya, M. N. (2019). Aerodynamic Design and Optimization of a Swept Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Blade [Doctoral dissertation]. Konya Technical University.
  10. Kumcu, S. Y., & Ucar, M. (2017). Dairesel kesitli dusulu bacalarda hava-su karısımının deneysel calısma ve CFD modelleme ile analizi.
  11. Kumcu, S. Y., & Ucar, M. (2019). Effect of Experimental and Mathematical Modeling of Spillway on Dam Safety. Advances in Safety Management and Human Factors: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Safety Management and Human Factors, July 21-25, 2018, Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA 9, 296–305.
  12. Kumcu, S. Y., & Ucar, M. (2020). KÖPRÜ BARAJI DOLUSAVAK YAPISININ DENEYSEL ÇALIŞMA VE SAYISAL MODELLEME İLE ANALİZİ. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.515220
  13. Matha, D. (2010). Model development and loads analysis of an offshore wind turbine on a tension leg platform with a comparison to other floating turbine concepts: April 2009.
  14. NREL. (2025). OpenFAST Documentation. https://openfast.readthedocs.io/en/main/
  15. Oguz, E., Clelland, D., Day, A. H., Incecik, A., López, J. A., Sánchez, G., & Almeria, G. G. (2018). Experimental and numerical analysis of a TLP floating offshore wind turbine. Ocean Engineering, 147, 591–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.10.052
  16. Putra, M. J., Oğuz, E., & Uzol, N. S. (2025). Investigation of Energy Production of an Offshore Wind Farm Using FAST.Farm’s Dynamic Wake Meandering Model and FLORIS. In Innovations in Sustainable Maritime Technology—IMAM 2025 (pp. 420–432). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01566-2_33
  17. Putra, M. J., Sezer Uzol, N., Ucar, M., & Oguz, E. (2024). Numerical Simulations of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines using Open-Source Codes on HPC.
  18. Savci, M., Hizalan, O., Metin, M., Karaduman, Y. E., Topcam, A. M., Ozgoren, M., & Demirsöz, M. (2023). Diverter in Hava Aliği Performansına Etkisinin Had Analizleriyle İncelenmesi. ASREL. https://doi.org/10.56753/ASREL.2023.2.2
  19. Tracy, C. C. H. (2007). Parametric design of floating wind turbines. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  20. Ucar, M. (2021). Mathematical Modelling of Air-Water Flow Structure in Circular Dropshafts [Master’s thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.
  21. Ucar, M. (2025). Site-specific development and fatigue evaluation of a tension leg platform for floating wind deployment in Türkiye [Doctoral dissertation]. METU.
  22. Ucar, M., Hmedi, M., Uzunoglu, E., & Oğuz, E. (2025). Design and Analysis of a Floating Wind Turbine for the Kıyıköy Region, Türkiye. In Innovations in Sustainable Maritime Technology—IMAM 2025 (pp. 433–445). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-01566-2_34
  23. Ucar, M., Hmedi, M., Uzunoglu, E., & Oguz, E. (2025a). Effect of panel method codes in estimating the time-domain responses of floating wind turbines. Brodogradnja: An International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering for Research and Development, 76(2), 1–31.
  24. Ucar, M., Hmedi, M., Uzunoglu, E., & Oguz, E. (2025b). Fatigue load evaluation of multiple floating wind turbine systems. Ocean Engineering, 330, 121101.
  25. Ucar, M., & Kumcu, S. Y. (2018). Comparison of physical modeling and CFD simulation of flow over spillway in the Arkun Dam. Proc. of 5th International Symp. on Dam Safety.
  26. Ucar, M., Uzunoglu, E., & Oguz, E. (2022). Comparison and Evaluation of Open-Source Panel Method Codes against Commercial Codes. Gemi ve Deniz Teknolojisi, 221, 86–108. https://doi.org/10.54926/gdt.1106386